Rule 30(b)(6) on Defense: Strategies for Protecting the Organization (On-Demand)

Course Description

This session will walk through a practical, defense-oriented playbook for handling a Rule 30(b)(6) notice. We will cover how to assess whether topics stated in the  Rule 30(b)(6) notice are stated with the required “reasonable particularity,” identify common defects in the notice (overbreadth, vagueness, excessive time scope, privilege/legal-conclusion traps, duplication of written discovery, irrelevance, and embedded document demands), and then execute a stepwise response: serving targeted written objections, initiating a strategic meet-and-confer to narrow/clarify topics, proposing reasonable limits that demonstrate good faith, and escalating, when necessary, to a Rule 26(c) protective order to strike or limit improper topics (and, in extreme cases, seek cost-shifting).

We will also cover strategy and techniques for identification and selection of any appropriate 30(b)(6) designee or designees, as well as practical tips for defending the designee at deposition.

Syllabus

1. Rule 30(b)(6) “reasonable particularity” requirement and why voluminous notices can signal overreach
2. Common defects courts find improper
3. Overly broad/vague topics; lack of particularity
4. Decades-long scopes without limits
5. Legal conclusions/privilege
6. Irrelevance
7. Document requests embedded in the notice (Rule 34 issues)
8. Serving written objections that are specific (not boilerplate)
9. Meet-and-confer strategy to narrow/clarify topics, consolidate duplication, and negotiate logistics (date/time/witness count)
10. Proposing reasonable limits (time and subject-matter limits, excluding privileged/legal analysis, phased depositions, written substitutes) to show good faith
11. Protective orders under Rule 26(c): When to move, what relief to seek (strike/limit/boundaries), and cost-shifting in extreme cases
12. Strategies for the selection of appropriate 30(b)(6) designee(s)
13. Preparation of 30(b)(6) designee(s) for deposition
14. Defending a 30(b)(6) designee at deposition